3 Comments

‘Birdman’ Review

So the Oscars are happening and I realized I didn’t get to see nearly anything that is nominated for Best Picture. Out of everything, there were a few that I really wanted to see regardless of the nominations. ‘Birdman’, ‘Whiplash’, and ‘American Sniper’. Everything else seems interesting, but I personally don’t care about the Oscars enough to make sure I see all of them. It’s just a huge political campaign, and film is subjective. Who cares. I just watch movies for my own enjoyment. But one of the good things that come out of the Oscars is the buzz a lot of movies get. And that’s what gets me to see some of them. Knowing that there’s a huge chance I’ll love it gives me a decent reason to watch it. The Oscars to me are no more than a recommendation list, and a fun Sunday night TV special.

Now onto the review! I decided to watch ‘Birdman’ since I had an interest in it beforehand. I love Michael Keaton, and the concept seemed really cool.

This film is definitely pretty awesome. The greatest part of it, I think, is that the whole thing is shot so freaking well. Like honestly, I never say this about a movie. To me a movie either looks like it’s shot by someone who knows how to hold a camera, or by someone who gave the camera to a 4 year old and let them shake it around. I have to give this film credit for how well the camera work was. The ENTIRE movie is edited to look as if it was filmed with one shot. You follow the characters the whole time, and when another speaks, the camera follows to that person, even when they’re walking away. I really had this illusion that this whole thing was done in a single take. As if it was a stage play that was filmed live. I don’t know how they did it, and I don’t want to know either. Because for the first time ever, I can honestly say that the camera work for a film actually blew my mind. And I want to keep it that way.

The acting is great all around. I of course, loved Michael Keaton. He might be my favorite actor to play Batman still, after all these years. And that’s another awesome thing about this. The movie is truly about him. The character in the film struggles with his loss of fame after not being the Birdman for many years. Michael Keaton himself was so famous after playing Batman, and then he kind of withered away a bit. He’s still relevant, of course. But this detail added to the realism of the movie. Even Edward Norton’s character played a version of himself in this, as a method actor.

The music was totally awesome. The entire score was improvised jazz drumming. It made every scene feel upbeat, and kept things moving. The mix of this and the camera work formed such an excellent flow.

My only small issue with this movie was how ambiguous the ending was. I’m not saying ambiguous endings are bad. I like them. But usually only if there are just two scenarios to be left to think about. A good example would be ‘Inception’. You’re left wondering whether the end is a dream or reality. Very simple, two way street, but still makes your head spin. This film has a similar ending, but it seems like there are multiple scenarios. When you dig too deep into it, it begins to not make any sense at all. To me, that’s not very good. It should have been a little bit simpler. A little ambiguity is good. Too much can make you wonder why you just spent so much time watching.

I will give ‘Birdman’ an A. It is so close to a perfect film. The only reason I couldn’t get it to a perfect score is because I felt the ending was a little bit too ambiguous, but it’s still a great ending as long as you don’t think TOO hard.
Aside from that, it’s purely beautiful. This is the kind of movie that is not for everybody. People that like to watch film as an art form will eat this up. General movie goers might think it’s flat out stupid and boring, and I get that. I was somewhere in the middle, but I was definitely able to appreciate this from a filmmaking standpoint.

And Update: IT JUST WON BEST PICTURE!

My review for ‘Whiplash’ will be posted soon!

3 comments on “‘Birdman’ Review

  1. “The ENTIRE movie was ONE shot” – actually not true, it was simply shot to look like one shot, much like ‘Silent House’ does the same thing but no one seems to remember. It’s more or less 10 minute segments cut together. There are moments where they go through a dark hallway real quick – and that’s actually where they cut, or when the camera zips to the right or left right next to a wall. They can do the same thing twice and make it look like the same shot.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Film Blog

The official home of everything in film

Corey Posnanski

Movies and Junk

Mini Media Reviews

Reviews of Film, TV, Music and Books

Funk's House of Geekery

Movies, Comics, Books, Games and Other Things Geeks Love

John Campea

Someone's got to say it, so it might as well be me

Deviant Theory

deviate from the norm

LazySundayMovies

Review-commendations

baby wants blue velvet

Yet to come up with a good tagline...

MovieBabble

The Casual Way to Discuss Movies

Mark My World

Hacking life while enjoying everything in between

There Has Been An Awakening

Serious Sci Fi studies.

CFY

Movie news and review site

%d bloggers like this: